Latest Keoghs Insight

Costs budget exaggeration is misconduct

Client Alerts||17/08/2017

Blackmore v Department for Communities and Local Government 2017 EWCA Civ 1136

Client Alerts||04/08/2017

Lord Justice Jackson's review into Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC)

Client Alerts||01/08/2017

Sentencing guidelines: Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea – update

Client Alerts||27/07/2017

Grant v Secretary of State for Transport: Guidance on Mesothelioma quantum

Client Alerts||06/07/2017

Blake v Croasdale & esure [2017] EWHC 1336 (QB)

Client Alerts||06/07/2017

Asymptomatic Silicosis Update: Feeney v Tarmac Sandstone Limited and one other

Client Alerts||26/06/2017

Dodd v Raebarn Estates Ltd

Client Alerts||23/06/2017

Ex-wife’s tip-off uncovers case of stolen identity leading to award of exemplary damages

News And Events||02/08/2017

Keoghs research warns of large rise in opportunistic insurance fraud

News And Events||17/07/2017

Keoghs launches 2017 apprenticeship programme

News And Events||09/06/2017

Scotland team expands at Keoghs one month after Glasgow office unveiled

News And Events||01/06/2017

Keoghs proud to support Bolton Wanderers Community Trust

News And Events||26/04/2017

Keoghs accelerates growth with move into Scotland

News And Events||19/04/2017

Keoghs sign up to new Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) affiliate membership

News And Events||05/04/2017

Keoghs celebrates award for fledgling apprenticeship scheme

News And Events||10/03/2017

Manslaughter consultation shows intent but lack of clarity

Blogs||11/08/2017

Counting the (wasted) cost of LNC

Blogs||02/08/2017

Credit hire: A strategic approach

Blogs||26/07/2017

Preserving insurers’ recovery rights following escape of water

Blogs||20/07/2017

Who is David Lidington?

Blogs||12/06/2017

Jackson v The Sugababes? Don’t delay… push the button!

Blogs||12/05/2017

Examining a Court of Appeal decision concerning the adequacy of Local Authority systems

Blogs||28/04/2017

Jumping for joy?

Blogs||24/04/2017

Credit Hire Aware 12

AWARE||19/07/2017

Costs Aware Issue 3

AWARE||22/06/2017

Property Aware 5

AWARE||14/06/2017

Credit Hire Aware 11

AWARE||21/12/2016

Fraud Aware 5

AWARE||27/10/2016

Costs Aware 2

AWARE||24/10/2016

Disease Aware 8

AWARE||05/10/2016

Credit Hire Aware 10

AWARE||18/08/2016

Keoghs Insight

We keep you up-to-date on emerging market issues and their impact on the insurance sector, through a variety of publications, events and our leading market initiatives.

Author

David  Hennessy

David Hennessy

Partner

T: 0141 238 0068

Scottish Parliament passes Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Bill

Client Alerts||22/06/2017

The Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Bill has today been passed by Parliament.  

The Bill seeks to amend the Prescription & Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 by removing the current three year limitation period in actions seeking damages in respect of personal injury where the action relates to abuse when the person who sustained the injuries was a child at the time of the abuse.  It allows the raising of claims dating as far back as 1964.  It also gives the right to resurrect claims that previously failed on the grounds of limitation.  

A final debate took place today and Parliament voted unanimously in favour of passing the Bill. 

What happens next?

The Bill will now go forward to law officers and if they do not raise any concerns within a 30 day period it will then go forward for Royal Assent.  The Scottish Ministers will return to Holyrood in the Autumn to lodge a commencement order which will state when the Act will come into effect. This could be as soon as the Autumn.

What does this mean for compensators?

Alastair Ross, Head of Public Policy (Scotland, Wales & NI) at the Association of British Insurers commented this evening that:

“At the heart of this legislation are victims and survivors who have been abused. The insurance industry is keen to be part of a system which keeps any further pain and distress to a minimum.

The ABI has expressed significant concerns on this Bill and the implications for insurers and their insureds who may now face claims dating as far back as 1964 under vicarious liability. These include the traceability of policies and legacy insurers, the verification of the details of historic claims, and the increased risk of claims in the future which may push up the cost of premiums.

We believe the Scottish Government has significantly underestimated the level of claims which will come forward, and the cost implications especially for charities, third sector organisations and public bodies including local authorities.”

Keoghs Viewpoint

There is anecdotal evidence that some claimant firms have a large number of claims waiting in the wings.  This obviously presents a concern for compensators particularly if these claims proceed to litigation at a pace.  Discussions are ongoing between interested parties regarding the possibility of a compulsory protocol being introduced specifically for historic child abuse claims in Scotland.  If the terms of such a protocol can be agreed, there are potential benefits for all parties.  Not only could this reduce costs for the compensators, particularly those who are self-insured, but could also avoid the trauma of claimants having to go through the litigation process.

This comes at a time when the funding of litigation in Scotland has been brought into sharp focus. On 2 June 2017, The Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Bill was published following Sheriff Principal Taylor’s review of Civil Litigation. This includes provision for QOCS (Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting) in personal injury claims meaning that any pursuer who conducts proceedings in an ‘appropriate manner’ will not have an award of expenses made against them. It is likely that QOCS will be introduced.  Therefore it will be vital for compensators to front load investigations in order to reduce the high cost of avoidable litigation.

David Pugh, Director of Disease Strategy, has acted for insurers in legacy claims in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. He explains:

“The removal of limitation will concentrate defenders’ minds on other defences, especially the reliability of each pursuer’s evidence. Keoghs’ Scottish team is highly skilled in conducting all the defences which remain open to compensators.  As well as Keoghs overall experience, the Scottish team includes a dual-qualified partner who dealt with such litigation in England & Wales when compensators were faced with a multitude of such claims.  Therefore the team are well placed to advise on tactics and strategy.”

For more information please contact:

David Pugh
Partner, Director of Disease Strategy
T: 0247 665 8274
E: dpugh@keoghs.co.uk

David Hennessy
Partner
T: 0141 238 0068
E: dhennessy@keoghs.co.uk

Stefanie Johnston
Partner (qualified in Scotland, England & Wales)
T: 0141 238 0067
E: sjohnston@keoghs.co.uk

Douglas Cowan
Partner
T: 0141 238 0070
E: dcowan@keoghs.co.uk