Head of Property Risks & Coverage
T:0203 436 2345
Richard is Head of the Property Risks and Coverage Team. Admitted as a solicitor in 1986 and joining Keoghs in 2017, he is a senior property and insurance lawyer with over 30 years’ experience of major property damage and insurance coverage litigation often involving construction, engineering and technology‐based issues.
Most of Richard’s career has been spent in the City, where he has always acted for insurers and specialises in technically orientated material damage and construction/engineering related claims. He deals with all classes of major material damage/business interruption losses as well as coverage disputes, involving the whole range from fire and flood through to non-disclosure and fraud. He is currently handling property recovery claims with individual values of up to £20m.
In 2012 he led the landmark litigation on behalf of the UK electricity distribution industry culminating in the decision in Smith & Others v South Eastern Power Networks  EWHC 2541 (TCC). Areas of particular interest in the recovery sector are M&E services fires, failure of engineered structures and major ground movements such as landslips.
Richard routinely features in the major client guides for this category of work and has been described in them as “a shining beacon” and “a prodigious worker who never lets the client down”. Other sources describe him as an “absolutely formidable” lawyer who “commands the full confidence of the insurance market”. In 2018, he was included in the Legal 500 Hall of Fame.
He is an accredited mediator and is also a regular writer and contributor to the insurance and technical press.
Latest Insights by Richard Houseago
Client Alerts 18/01/2021
Partner and Head of Property Risks and Coverage, Richard Houseago focuses on two issues that have emerged as a result of the Supreme Court decision announced on Friday 15 January 2021.
Client Alerts 16/09/2020
So we now have the first instance decision of the High Court in the FCA test cases exploring the true construction of certain non-damage extensions to a range of Business Interruption policies. As the dust starts to settle, subject to any appeals, what might concerned BI insurers be considering next?
Client Alerts 12/12/2019
For a number of years now an interesting issue has been simmering about whether a business entity has a strict cause of action for damage to its commercial property because of the combined effect of Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 and “safety regulations” introduced pursuant to part II of that Act.