Our Expertise
- Abuse
- Advocacy
- Artificial Intelligence
- Care
- Casualty
- Casualty Fraud
- Complex & Catastrophic Loss
- Construction & Engineering
- Contingency
- Corporate & Sector Risks
- COSHH
- Costs
- Counter-Fraud
- Credit Hire
- Credit Hire Fraud
- Cyber Risks
- Dermatitis
- Directors and Officers Insurance
- Disease
- Enforcements
- Financial Institutions
- Fraud Rings
- Fraud Screening: Mass Data Analysis
- Gadgets & Mobile Fraud
- HAVS
- Health & Safety
- Healthcare
- Healthcare Enabled Fraud
- Insurance Contract Wording & Drafting
- Intelligence Services
- Legacy
- Local Authority/Public Sector
- Marine Ports & Offshore - Fraud
- Marine, Ports & Offshore
- Mesothelioma
- Motor
- Motor Crime
- Motor Fraud
- Motor Trade
- NIHL
- Occupational Asthma
- Occupational Cancer
- Pet and Animals
- Policy Coverage
- Product Liability
- Professional and Financial Risks
- Property Damage
- Property Fraud
- Property Risks and Coverage
- Reinsurance
- Sport
- Subrogated Recoveries
- Subsidence
- Subtle Brain Injury
- Travel
- Volume
- WRULD
Login
Search
Keoghs Insight
Author
Stuart Hunt
Property Insurance Aware 4
AWARE29/02/2016
Welcome to the latest edition of Keoghs’ Property Insurance AWARE magazine, which we hope you continue to find useful.
Key developments in this issue include an update on the Insurance Act 2015 (due to come into force in August 2016), including an assessment of the impact of the Enterprise Bill 2015 (due to take effect in 2017).
Articles in this edition include consideration of the application of waste warranties and recyclable items and the implications of late settlement of damages payments. We offer our thoughts on the right of insurers to bring subrogated recovery claims and consider the Wrotham Park case, and the resultant implications on negotiating damages in lieu of injunctive relief.
In what will undoubtedly be an interesting year in terms of judicial impact, we await with interest the result of the Supreme Court hearing of Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors v the Mayor of London’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPC). In this case the Court will consider the question of whether or not the MOPC was liable under the Riot (Damages) Act 1996 for the consequential losses suffered by victims and their insurers as a result of a fire deliberately caused during the 2011 London Riots. Rest assured we will provide an update at the relevant time.
Should you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact Matthew Rogers or the author of the relevant article.
AWARE 29/02/2016
Throwing money away?
A consideration of the application of waste warranties and recyclable items.
AWARE 29/02/2016
Subrogated recovery against co-insured third parties
What happens when a claim is pursued against a third party, who is a co-insured on the policy?
AWARE 29/02/2016
Quid Pro Quo
Our specialist commercial insurance litigators look at negotiating damages in lieu of injunctive relief.
AWARE 29/02/2016
Share and share alike: contribution claims
In claims which arise as a result of damage to property, liability can potentially attach to several parties to varying degrees.
AWARE 29/02/2016
When ignorance is not bliss...
The implications of failing to respond to a Letter of Claim.
AWARE 29/02/2016
Introducing the Commercial Litigation Editorial Team
The authors of the articles within this edition of AWARE are members of the commercial litigation team, which is led by partner Matthew Rogers.