Latest Keoghs Insight

Costs budget exaggeration is misconduct

Client Alerts||17/08/2017

Blackmore v Department for Communities and Local Government 2017 EWCA Civ 1136

Client Alerts||04/08/2017

Lord Justice Jackson's review into Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC)

Client Alerts||01/08/2017

Sentencing guidelines: Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea – update

Client Alerts||27/07/2017

Grant v Secretary of State for Transport: Guidance on Mesothelioma quantum

Client Alerts||06/07/2017

Blake v Croasdale & esure [2017] EWHC 1336 (QB)

Client Alerts||06/07/2017

Asymptomatic Silicosis Update: Feeney v Tarmac Sandstone Limited and one other

Client Alerts||26/06/2017

Dodd v Raebarn Estates Ltd

Client Alerts||23/06/2017

Ex-wife’s tip-off uncovers case of stolen identity leading to award of exemplary damages

News And Events||02/08/2017

Keoghs research warns of large rise in opportunistic insurance fraud

News And Events||17/07/2017

Keoghs launches 2017 apprenticeship programme

News And Events||09/06/2017

Scotland team expands at Keoghs one month after Glasgow office unveiled

News And Events||01/06/2017

Keoghs proud to support Bolton Wanderers Community Trust

News And Events||26/04/2017

Keoghs accelerates growth with move into Scotland

News And Events||19/04/2017

Keoghs sign up to new Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) affiliate membership

News And Events||05/04/2017

Keoghs celebrates award for fledgling apprenticeship scheme

News And Events||10/03/2017

Manslaughter consultation shows intent but lack of clarity

Blogs||11/08/2017

Counting the (wasted) cost of LNC

Blogs||02/08/2017

Credit hire: A strategic approach

Blogs||26/07/2017

Preserving insurers’ recovery rights following escape of water

Blogs||20/07/2017

Who is David Lidington?

Blogs||12/06/2017

Jackson v The Sugababes? Don’t delay… push the button!

Blogs||12/05/2017

Examining a Court of Appeal decision concerning the adequacy of Local Authority systems

Blogs||28/04/2017

Jumping for joy?

Blogs||24/04/2017

Credit Hire Aware 12

AWARE||19/07/2017

Costs Aware Issue 3

AWARE||22/06/2017

Property Aware 5

AWARE||14/06/2017

Credit Hire Aware 11

AWARE||21/12/2016

Fraud Aware 5

AWARE||27/10/2016

Costs Aware 2

AWARE||24/10/2016

Disease Aware 8

AWARE||05/10/2016

Credit Hire Aware 10

AWARE||18/08/2016

Keoghs Insight

We keep you up-to-date on emerging market issues and their impact on the insurance sector, through a variety of publications, events and our leading market initiatives.

Author

Chris Newton

Chris Newton

Partner

T: 0238 190 7002

Sentencing guidelines: Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea – update

Client Alerts||27/07/2017

On 1 June 2017, a new guideline published by the Sentencing Council came into force which encourages those contemplating a guilty plea to do so at the earliest possible opportunity.  The new guideline applies to matters heard in the Crown and Magistrates’ Courts including health and safety offences.

The Effect

The effect of the new guideline is that if the defendant does not act quickly and enter a guilty plea at the first hearing, it may not attract the maximum sentence discount of one third. After the first hearing, there is a sliding scale of reduction with it decreasing to one quarter at the next hearing and then one tenth on the first day of trial.

There are exceptions where the “particular circumstances” significantly reduce the defendant’s ability to understand what is alleged or otherwise make it unreasonable to indicate a guilty plea at the first stage. In those cases, which are likely to be multi party complex regulatory prosecutions, a one third reduction may still apply.

In many health and safety prosecutions, a summons is received by a defendant with a first hearing date only weeks away. This can create considerable pressure for the defendant to consider the evidence against it and finalise its position before the first hearing. This is compounded by the significant increase in fines for corporate manslaughter, health and safety and food safety offences which were introduced in new sentencing guidelines in February 2016. In the first twelve months following the introduction of those guidelines, the court imposed 19 fines above £1m (there were 3 in 2015 and none in 2014) and the average fine increased by 102%. There has also been a sharp increase in the number of custodial or suspended sentences with 35 between October 2016 and April 2017 for workplace health and safety offences.

Advice

This new guideline re-iterates the need to get proper advice as soon as there has been an incident which may be prosecuted so that the defendant is prepared and ready to plead at the appropriate time.

Failing to act quickly could reduce the guilty plea sentencing discount which is particularly important because of the higher fines we are seeing following the introduction of the new sentencing guidelines.

For more information, please contact:

Chris Newton
Partner
London
T: 02381 907002
E: cnewton@keoghs.co.uk

David Walton
Partner
Bolton
T: 01204 677231
E: dwalton@keoghs.co.uk