Latest Keoghs Insight

Costs budget exaggeration is misconduct

Client Alerts||17/08/2017

Blackmore v Department for Communities and Local Government 2017 EWCA Civ 1136

Client Alerts||04/08/2017

Lord Justice Jackson's review into Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC)

Client Alerts||01/08/2017

Sentencing guidelines: Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea – update

Client Alerts||27/07/2017

Grant v Secretary of State for Transport: Guidance on Mesothelioma quantum

Client Alerts||06/07/2017

Blake v Croasdale & esure [2017] EWHC 1336 (QB)

Client Alerts||06/07/2017

Asymptomatic Silicosis Update: Feeney v Tarmac Sandstone Limited and one other

Client Alerts||26/06/2017

Dodd v Raebarn Estates Ltd

Client Alerts||23/06/2017

Ex-wife’s tip-off uncovers case of stolen identity leading to award of exemplary damages

News And Events||02/08/2017

Keoghs research warns of large rise in opportunistic insurance fraud

News And Events||17/07/2017

Keoghs launches 2017 apprenticeship programme

News And Events||09/06/2017

Scotland team expands at Keoghs one month after Glasgow office unveiled

News And Events||01/06/2017

Keoghs proud to support Bolton Wanderers Community Trust

News And Events||26/04/2017

Keoghs accelerates growth with move into Scotland

News And Events||19/04/2017

Keoghs sign up to new Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) affiliate membership

News And Events||05/04/2017

Keoghs celebrates award for fledgling apprenticeship scheme

News And Events||10/03/2017

Manslaughter consultation shows intent but lack of clarity


Counting the (wasted) cost of LNC


Credit hire: A strategic approach


Preserving insurers’ recovery rights following escape of water


Who is David Lidington?


Jackson v The Sugababes? Don’t delay… push the button!


Examining a Court of Appeal decision concerning the adequacy of Local Authority systems


Jumping for joy?


Credit Hire Aware 12


Costs Aware Issue 3


Property Aware 5


Credit Hire Aware 11


Fraud Aware 5


Costs Aware 2


Disease Aware 8


Credit Hire Aware 10


Keoghs Insight

We keep you up-to-date on emerging market issues and their impact on the insurance sector, through a variety of publications, events and our leading market initiatives.



Ex-wife’s tip-off uncovers case of stolen identity leading to award of exemplary damages

News And Events||02/08/2017

Judge remarks on ‘overwhelming’ evidence of fraud as claimant ordered to pay exemplary damages and costs following finding of fundamental dishonesty

In the recent case of Phillips v Zurich Insurance, a claimant’s elaborate deception rapidly unravelled after his ex-wife uncovered evidence of fraudulent activity while clearing out the marital home.

The claim arose from a genuine incident when the insured driver collided with the claimant (Mr Phillips) who was driving his ex-wife’s car out of a side road. Whilst her losses were settled with no issue, Mr Phillips claimed whiplash injuries, loss of earnings (as a self-employed HGV driver), along with other costs such as taxi journeys and gym membership.

Suspicions arose when his ex-wife discovered medical reports, along with blank taxi receipts and other documents which pointed to fraud. She tipped Zurich off, who in turn instructed Keoghs to look into the allegations further.

Investigations by Keoghs’ counter-fraud team revealed a raft of incriminating evidence;

Armed with such damning evidence, Keoghs and Zurich amended the defence to fundamental dishonesty and pursued a counter claim for exemplary damages.

A statement was then obtained from the real Mr Oakley and an application made to rely on it, at which point the claimant’s solicitor unsurprisingly came off record.

Matters moved swiftly towards a conclusion hereon in, with the court granting a request for the claimant to disclose bank statements showing payments to Mr Oakley or, at least, the cash leaving his account. Mr Phillips failed to comply and his claim, along with his defence to the counterclaim, was struck out on 31 May.

On 7 June, the court awarded Zurich exemplary damages of £20,000 along with costs, stating that evidence of the claimant’s fraud was ‘overwhelming’.

Following the judgment, Keoghs Solicitor, Jessica Swire, said;

“This is a particularly rewarding result given the level of deceit displayed by the claimant and the severity of the punishment following our counter claim for exemplary damages. With opportunistic fraud becoming an ever increasing issue for the industry, it is vital that insurers continue to take a stand against such claims.”

Scott Clayton, Zurich Claims Fraud & Investigations Manager, added;

“Thanks to great collaboration between Zurich and Keoghs, this serial liar finally met his match. Some people will stop at nothing to pursue fraudulent claims but thanks to our robust approach, endorsed by the courts, he might think twice about doing so in the future.”