Latest Keoghs Insight

JR v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundations Trust [2017] EWHC 1245 (QB)

Client Alerts||30/10/2017

Fourteenth Edition of the Judicial College’s Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases

Client Alerts||15/09/2017

Personal Injury Discount Rate

Client Alerts||08/09/2017

Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Act 2017 to come into force in October 2017

Client Alerts||23/08/2017

Costs budget exaggeration is misconduct

Client Alerts||17/08/2017

Blackmore v Department for Communities and Local Government 2017 EWCA Civ 1136

Client Alerts||04/08/2017

Lord Justice Jackson's review into Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC)

Client Alerts||01/08/2017

Sentencing guidelines: Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea – update

Client Alerts||27/07/2017

Minibus claims worth over £100,000 stopped dead in their tracks as Keoghs and Mulsanne Insurance prove fundamental dishonesty

News And Events||20/11/2017

Keoghs IT team celebrate double award win

News And Events||17/11/2017

Keoghs unveils first true AI insurance lawyer

News And Events||07/11/2017

Expansion continues for Keoghs with launch of Marine, Ports and Offshore team

News And Events||03/11/2017

Automated and Electric Vehicles Bill

News And Events||20/10/2017

Keoghs IT team recognised in prestigious awards

News And Events||19/10/2017

Disputed causation leaves claimants paying the price

News And Events||17/10/2017

Keoghs announce 20 promotions and four new appointments

News And Events||31/08/2017

The Meaning of “Accidental Damage”

Blogs||14/11/2017

Is an approved budget the starting point for a payment on account of costs?

Blogs||08/11/2017

The Discount Rate - Time to Draw the Line?

Blogs||25/10/2017

Out of your Control: The expanding limits of vicarious liability - Natasha Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council

Blogs||23/10/2017

Keoghs Launches Online Ogden Multiplier Calculator

Blogs||09/10/2017

A new way of life? Magill v Panel Systems (DB Limited)

Blogs||27/09/2017

Driver disqualification and the case for exceptional hardship

Blogs||25/09/2017

Health and Safety Executive FFI invoices – new panel, same challenges

Blogs||21/09/2017

Credit Hire Aware 12

AWARE||19/07/2017

Costs Aware Issue 3

AWARE||22/06/2017

Property Aware 5

AWARE||14/06/2017

Credit Hire Aware 11

AWARE||21/12/2016

Fraud Aware 5

AWARE||27/10/2016

Costs Aware 2

AWARE||24/10/2016

Disease Aware 8

AWARE||05/10/2016

Credit Hire Aware 10

AWARE||18/08/2016

Keoghs Insight

We keep you up-to-date on emerging market issues and their impact on the insurance sector, through a variety of publications, events and our leading market initiatives.

Author

Keoghs

Keoghs help enforce eight year bankruptcy for fraudster after tort of deceit action

News And Events||09/03/2017

Following a case in which Keoghs and Churchill Insurance successfully pursued a finding of fraud against two claimants, a tort of deceit action was run which led to the court awarding the insurer further costs and exemplary damages, leading to a total liability of £51,870.

Subsequently the Keoghs enforcement team pursued the claimants to recover the amount owed and, after they failed to make an interim payment, Keoghs successfully petitioned for both claimants to be made bankrupt. In February 2017, the Insolvency Service decided to extend the bankruptcy period of one of the claimants, Mr Shajahan, to eight years.

The original incident involved a collision whereby Churchill’s insured allegedly hit the rear of the claimants’ vehicle, which was said to be driven by Mr Shajahan with the second claimant, Mr Moynul, a passenger.

The initial trial took place in July 2014, with the judge finding the claims to be fraudulent and both claimants having been dishonest in their evidence.

Both were ordered to pay Churchill’s costs on an indemnity basis, including interim payments on account of costs. When these interim payments failed to materialise, the costs orders were passed to Keoghs’ enforcement team who put a charging order on one of the claimant’s properties whilst further action was taken.

Given the additional expenses and payments Churchill had incurred prior to the fraud being discovered, the insurer decided to run a tort of deceit case, led by Keoghs Associate Solicitor Hamida Khatun, to send out a clear message. In November 2014, a claim was issued against both claimants for recovery of the payments that had been made along with exemplary damages.

At the second trial, both claimants (who were defendants in the tort of deceit action), failed to serve any defence or witness evidence and did not attend court.

Not only did the judge find that the deceit had been proven and awarded the compensatory losses as claimed in the sum of £7,192, the judge decided to show the displeasure of the court at their conduct and awarded exemplary damages in the sum of £7,500 - over 100% of the insurers actual loss. Additionally, costs were awarded in the sum of £16,000 against both claimants.

The judgments were also sent to the Keoghs enforcement team and, given a continued failure to pay, the claimants were made bankrupt on 13th January 2016.

In February of this year, the official receiver decided to enforce an extension of Mr Shajahan’s bankruptcy to eight years, a significant sign of intent given the standard length of a bankruptcy order is one year.

Keoghs Associate Solicitor, Hamida Khatun, commented;

“This is an important reminder to fraudsters that fraud is taken seriously and, having put an insurer to significant expense in investigating and defending a fraudulent claim, they should not expect to ‘walk away’ without any sanction or penalty. The unique feature of this case was that, in extending the claimant’s bankruptcy order to eight years, the official receiver took into account the court’s finding of fraudulent conduct in the action that led to the original debt.”