• Home / Insight / Judicial College Guidelines 18th edition: impact on catastrophic and large loss injury claims

    Judicial College Guidelines 18th edition: impact on catastrophic and large loss injury claims

    09/04/2026

    The subject of inflation is seemingly never far from the news these days and the same is true in the claims arena. The publication of the latest 18th edition of the JC guidelines today emphasises that point.

    The broad headline is that the brackets in the main have been increased by 8.26%, although as in previous years certain brackets have been increased by different percentages.

    The continued use of RPI

    This has been, and remains, a continuing debate and is recognised once more in the introduction to the latest edition.

    It is acknowledged that alternative inflationary indices may be appropriate. However, the editorial team maintain that it is not for them to prescribe a different inflationary index, with that being a matter for the courts. The editorial team also recognise that it may be difficult to find a case in which the issue can be litigated to a conclusion. They do stress the importance that the issue of an appropriate index is resolved, particularly with the Government’s stated intention to replace RPI by the end of this decade.

    Some example uplifts

    In the catastrophic and large loss injury space, based on the 18th edition the most serious injuries now have brackets at the top end in excess of £500,000.

    JCG 18th editionPercentage uplift18th ed Lower18th ed Upper17th ed Lower17th ed Upper
    2A - Tetraplegia8.26%£428,850£533,720£396,140£493,000
    2B - Paraplegia8.26%£289,420£375,540£267,340£346,890
    3A(a) - Brain damage v. severe8.26%£372,570£533,720£344,150£493,000
    3A(b) - Brain damage mod severe8.26%£289,420£372,570£267,340£344,150
    7J (a) (iv) – Below-knee amputation of one leg8.26%£129,440£175,690£119,570£162,290

     

    Other material changes

    There are other changes contained within the 18th edition such as updates to the category of sexual and/or physical abuse in Chapter 4 and the introduction of a new section on miscarriage in Chapter 6, but the most significant revision in catastrophic and large loss injury cases is perhaps to the epilepsy section in Chapter 3.

    Updated medical terminology has been introduced, replacing outdated terms such as ‘grand mal’ and ‘petit mal’ with current classifications of generalised motor (tonic-clonic) and focal seizures. The previous structure, which separated the two categories of epilepsy, has been replaced with a single, broader bracket of £72,440 - £198,320, reflecting the fact that the factors influencing the level of award are likely to be similar. A separate category for 'other epileptic conditions' has been retained.

    Practice points

    As the introduction to the latest edition makes clear, the guidelines are not binding upon the courts, being of persuasive authority at most. Nevertheless, it is accepted that they are widely used and relied upon by practitioners and the judiciary.

    It is also to be remembered that the guidelines are based on RPI as at August 2025 and so the figures would need to be further uplifted by the relevant RPI between August 2025 and the relevant settlement date.

    Please contact us for further insight on this and claims inflation issues generally.

     

    Ken Young - Head of Complex & CAT PI

    Mark Whalley - Partner

    Natalie Larnder - Head of Market Affairs

     

    Ken Young
    Author

    Ken Young
    Partner
    Head of Complex and CAT PI

    LinkedIn Icon Contact

    Stay informed with Keoghs

    Sign-up

    Our Expertise

    Vr

    Claims Technology Solutions

    Disrupting claims management with innovation & technology

     

    The service you deliver is integral to the success of your business. With the right technology, we can help you to heighten your customer experience, improve underwriting performance, and streamline processes.